Hey Arun, I think I see. Basically, 2646's patch is using the priority number as an ID for a container (or group of containers) within an AllocateRequest.
So, in my scenario, I could set ResourceRequest 1 to priority 1, and ResourceRequest 2 to priority 2, and (with this patch) get the priority back out on the other end. Is this correct? Are priorities cross-application, or just for containers within the application? Cheers, Chris On 9/22/11 2:13 PM, "Arun C Murthy" <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > Also, for now you can assume it's the highest outstanding priority or wait for > MR-2646. > > On Sep 22, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Chris Riccomini wrote: > >> Hey Guys, >> >> I¹m sure there¹s a way to do this, but I¹m missing it. >> >> If I have an AllocateRequest with multiple ResourceRequests in it (say 2), >> and I get two containers back, how do I map which container was sent back for >> which ResourceRequest? >> >> Thanks! >> Chris >
