I filed MR-3210. Thanks On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Arun C Murthy <[email protected]> wrote: >> The CS has always treated rack-local same as node-local... so yes, the >> current behaviour is expected. > > Hrm - never knew that -- I'm usually a fairscheduler user, and the FS > does do delay scheduling for both types of locality. > > What was the logic that lead to this decision? A small amount of delay > for node locality seems worth it, especially on small clusters (<40 > nodes) with 1gbit networking. > > If there's no particular reason against it, I'll file a JIRA to add it > as an option. > > -Todd > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera >
-- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
