Thanks for trying the new binary out, Akira. I just updated the binary to
include the site files as well.


On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Akira AJISAKA <ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>
wrote:

> Thanks Karthik for the update, but the some documents are not included.
>
> It looks to me that *.apt.vm files are not compiled.
> Would you please generate documents with
> 'mvn site site:stage /path/to/deploy'?
>
> I'm +1 (non-binding) if the documents are included.
>
> Thanks,
> Akira
>
>
> (2014/08/12 13:49), Karthik Kambatla wrote:
>
>> I have updated the binary tar ball to include the docs, by building the
>> docs locally and copying them over. Filed HADOOP-10956 to fix the
>> create-release script to handle this.
>>
>> The RC is here: http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0-RC2/
>>
>> Please note that the binary tar ball is signed by a new gpg key, so please
>> re-import keys. (I lost my original private key). The source tar ball,
>> signature and checksum are untouched.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA <ozawa.tsuyo...@gmail.com
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Thank you for dealing with this problem, Karthik. It sounds reasonable
>>> to me to update binary tarball without modifying source code.
>>> +1(non-binding) to continue the voting.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> - Tsuyoshi
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Akira for catching the missing docs. Let me work on *updating*
>>>> the
>>>> binary tarball to include the docs *without* modifying the source. Will
>>>> send an update as soon as I sort that out.
>>>>
>>>> The vote itself is on the source and the binary is just a convenience. I
>>>> hope we can let the vote continue so long as we don't change the source.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Karthik
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA <
>>>>
>>> ozawa.tsuyo...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  -1 (non-binding).
>>>>>
>>>>> * Downloaded source and verified signature.
>>>>> * Built from source.
>>>>> * Ran tests and some MR jobs.
>>>>> * Ran RM-HA with manual failover mode.
>>>>> - Documents are missing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Good catch, Akira. As he mentioned, the documents including javadocs
>>>>> are missing from the binary tar ball. We should include them. It only
>>>>> includes following docs:
>>>>> $ find . -name *.html
>>>>> ./share/doc/hadoop/httpfs/dependency-analysis.html
>>>>> ./share/doc/hadoop/httpfs/UsingHttpTools.html
>>>>> ./share/doc/hadoop/httpfs/project-reports.html
>>>>> ./share/doc/hadoop/httpfs/ServerSetup.html
>>>>> ./share/doc/hadoop/httpfs/index.html
>>>>> ./share/hadoop/httpfs/tomcat/webapps/ROOT/index.html
>>>>> ./share/hadoop/hdfs/webapps/secondary/status.html
>>>>> ./share/hadoop/hdfs/webapps/secondary/index.html
>>>>> ./share/hadoop/hdfs/webapps/hdfs/dfshealth.html
>>>>> ./share/hadoop/hdfs/webapps/hdfs/explorer.html
>>>>> ./share/hadoop/hdfs/webapps/hdfs/index.html
>>>>> ./share/hadoop/hdfs/webapps/journal/index.html
>>>>> ./share/hadoop/hdfs/webapps/datanode/index.html
>>>>> ./share/hadoop/tools/sls/html/showSimulationTrace.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Karthik, could you create new tar ball with the documentations?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> - Tsuyoshi
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 5:59 AM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have put together a release candidate (rc2) for Hadoop 2.5.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The RC is available at:
>>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~kasha/hadoop-2.5.0-RC2/
>>>>>
>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/
>>> release-2.5.0-rc2/
>>>
>>>> The maven artifacts are staged at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>> orgapachehadoop-1009/
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> You can find my public key at:
>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/dist/KEYS
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please try the release and vote. The vote will run for the now usual 5
>>>>>> days.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> - Tsuyoshi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> - Tsuyoshi
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to