Seems like they are already in, nothing more to do here.. +Vinod
On Apr 1, 2015, at 7:45 PM, Zhijie Shen <zs...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > Can we include YARN-3273 into 2.7? YARN-3430 needs it to fix the RM web UI > bug. > > Thanks, > Zhijie > ________________________________________ > From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vino...@hortonworks.com> > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 3:35 PM > To: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org > Cc: yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; Hadoop Common > Subject: Re: 2.7 status > > This is the filter I am using: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12330598 > > +Vinod > > On Mar 25, 2015, at 11:47 AM, Konstantin Shvachko <shv.had...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Progress is good! >> What are the four blockers? >> Could you please mark them as such in the Jira. >> >> Thanks, >> --Konst >> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < >> vino...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >> >>> Progress has been really slow, but now we are down to four blockers across >>> the board. >>> >>> I plan to roll an RC this weekend. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> +Vinod >>> >>> On Mar 8, 2015, at 8:40 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < >>> vino...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >>> >>>> 2.7 branch created and branch-2 updated to point to 2.8-SNAPSHOT. >>>> >>>> Committers, please exercise caution on the content going into >>> branch-2.7. I'd take help everyone's help in pushing through the remaining >>> set of blockers targeted for 2.7. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> +Vinod >>>> >>>> On Mar 8, 2015, at 8:21 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < >>> vino...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Branching 2.7 now. Request holding off commits to branch-2 to avoid >>> commit race. Will send an all-clear in the next 30 mins once I am done. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> +Vinod >>>>> >>>>> On Mar 5, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < >>> vino...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The 2.7 blocker JIRA went down and going back up again, we will need >>> to converge. >>>>>> >>>>>> Unless I see objections, I plan to cut a branch this weekend and >>> selectively filter stuff in after that in the interest of convergence. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts welcome! >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> +Vinod >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 1, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Arun Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Sounds good, thanks for the help Vinod! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Arun >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>>>> From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli >>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2015 11:43 AM >>>>>>> To: Hadoop Common; Jason Lowe; Arun Murthy >>>>>>> Subject: Re: 2.7 status >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Agreed. How about we roll an RC end of this week? As a Java 7+ >>> release with features, patches that already got in? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here's a filter tracking blocker tickets - >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12330598. Nine open now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +Arun >>>>>>> Arun, I'd like to help get 2.7 out without further delay. Do you mind >>> me taking over release duties? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> +Vinod >>>>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>>>> From: Jason Lowe <jl...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> >>>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:11 AM >>>>>>> To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org >>>>>>> Subject: Re: 2.7 status >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd like to see a 2.7 release sooner than later. It has been almost >>> 3 months since Hadoop 2.6 was released, and there have already been 634 >>> JIRAs committed to 2.7. That's a lot of changes waiting for an official >>> release. >>>>>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20in%20%28hadoop%2Chdfs%2Cyarn%2Cmapreduce%29%20AND%20fixversion%3D2.7.0%20AND%20resolution%3DFixed >>>>>>> Jason >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org> >>>>>>> To: "common-...@hadoop.apache.org" <common-...@hadoop.apache.org> >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 1:30 PM >>>>>>> Subject: 2.7 status >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What is the current status of the 2.7 release? I know initially it >>> started >>>>>>> out as a "java-7" only release, but looking at the JIRAs that is very >>> much >>>>>>> not the case. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do we have a certain timeframe for 2.7 or is it time to discuss it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Sangjin >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>>
