As pointed by Arpit, the previously deployed shared jars are incorrect.
Just redeployed jars and staged. @Arpit, could you please check the updated
Maven repo?
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1092

Since the jars inside binary tarballs are correct (
http://people.apache.org/~wangda/hadoop-3.1.0-RC1/). I think we don't need
roll another RC, just update Maven repo should be sufficient.

Best,
Wangda


On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Wangda Tan <wheele...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Arpit,
>
> Thanks for pointing out this.
>
> I just removed all .md5 files from artifacts. I found md5 checksums still
> exist in .mds files and I didn't remove them from .mds file because it is
> generated by create-release script and Apache guidance is "should not"
> instead of "must not". Please let me know if you think they need to be
> removed as well.
>
> - Wangda
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Arpit Agarwal <aagar...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for putting together this RC, Wangda.
>>
>> The guidance from Apache is to omit MD5s, specifically:
>>   > SHOULD NOT supply a MD5 checksum file (because MD5 is too broken).
>>
>> https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 2, 2018, at 7:03 AM, Wangda Tan <wheele...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Gera,
>>
>> It's my bad, I thought only src/bin tarball is enough.
>>
>> I just uploaded all other things under artifact/ to
>> http://people.apache.org/~wangda/hadoop-3.1.0-RC1/
>>
>> Please let me know if you have any other comments.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Wangda
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 12:50 AM, Gera Shegalov <ger...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, Wangda!
>>
>> There are many more artifacts in previous votes, e.g., see
>> http://home.apache.org/~junping_du/hadoop-2.8.3-RC0/ .  Among others the
>> site tarball is missing.
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 11:54 PM Sunil G <sun...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Wangda for initiating the release.
>>
>> I tested this RC built from source file.
>>
>>
>>   - Tested MR apps (sleep, wc) and verified both new YARN UI and old RM
>> UI.
>>   - Below feature sanity is done
>>      - Application priority
>>      - Application timeout
>>      - Intra Queue preemption with priority based
>>      - DS based affinity tests to verify placement constraints.
>>   - Tested basic NodeLabel scenarios.
>>      - Added couple of labels to few of nodes and behavior is coming
>>      correct.
>>      - Verified old UI  and new YARN UI for labels.
>>      - Submitted apps to labelled cluster and it works fine.
>>      - Also performed few cli commands related to nodelabel.
>>   - Test basic HA cases and seems correct.
>>   - Tested new YARN UI . All pages are getting loaded correctly.
>>
>>
>> - Sunil
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 9:45 AM Wangda Tan <wheele...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Thanks to the many who helped with this release since Dec 2017 [1].
>>
>> We've
>>
>> created RC1 for Apache Hadoop 3.1.0. The artifacts are available here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~wangda/hadoop-3.1.0-RC1
>>
>> The RC tag in git is release-3.1.0-RC1. Last git commit SHA is
>> 16b70619a24cdcf5d3b0fcf4b58ca77238ccbe6d
>>
>> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>
>> orgapachehadoop-1090/
>>
>> This vote will run 5 days, ending on Apr 3 at 11:59 pm Pacific.
>>
>> 3.1.0 contains 766 [2] fixed JIRA issues since 3.0.0. Notable additions
>> include the first class GPU/FPGA support on YARN, Native services,
>>
>> Support
>>
>> rich placement constraints in YARN, S3-related enhancements, allow HDFS
>> block replicas to be provided by an external storage system, etc.
>>
>> For 3.1.0 RC0 vote discussion, please see [3].
>>
>> We’d like to use this as a starting release for 3.1.x [1], depending on
>>
>> how
>>
>> it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 3.1.1 in several weeks
>>
>> as
>>
>> the stable release.
>>
>> We have done testing with a pseudo cluster:
>> - Ran distributed job.
>> - GPU scheduling/isolation.
>> - Placement constraints (intra-application anti-affinity) by using
>> distributed shell.
>>
>> My +1 to start.
>>
>> Best,
>> Wangda/Vinod
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b3fb3b6da8b6357a68513a6dfd104b
>>
>> c9e19e559aedc5ebedb4ca08c8@%3Cyarn-dev.hadoop.apache.org%3E
>>
>> [2] project in (YARN, HADOOP, MAPREDUCE, HDFS) AND fixVersion in (3.1.0)
>> AND fixVersion not in (3.0.0, 3.0.0-beta1) AND status = Resolved ORDER
>>
>> BY
>>
>> fixVersion ASC
>> [3]
>>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b3a7dc075b7329fd660f65b48237d7
>>
>> 2d4061f26f83547e41d0983ea6@%3Cyarn-dev.hadoop.apache.org%3E
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to