[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12834453#action_12834453
 ] 

Chris Douglas commented on MAPREDUCE-326:
-----------------------------------------

Doug, the comments on the design document are trying to avoid the other side of 
this, where a patch is developed- even committed- without attention to parts of 
the framework unknown to the author.

Nobody is imposing a set of priorities. The argument has always been that there 
is insufficient evidence to support this direction, but neither is there 
sufficient evidence against it to reject it entirely, hence "revisit later," 
i.e. admitting the possibility that such evidence could exist. The objections 
raised are warning that the maintenance burden of the proposed API may outweigh 
its benefits. Dismissing those objections and experience as "unproductive" is 
ignoring their premise: the APIs are not the cause. You're ignoring all the 
other suggestions and alternatives, closing discussion, then asserting that the 
competition is _between_ new APIs- the point about which the disagreement 
turns- and that it's time to write code.

JIRAs related to security aren't adding a parallel mechanism that might, 
hypothetically, improve things in _still unnamed_ cases. That analogy is forced.

> The lowest level map-reduce APIs should be byte oriented
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-326
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-326
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: eric baldeschwieler
>         Attachments: MAPREDUCE-326-api.patch, MAPREDUCE-326.pdf
>
>
> As discussed here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1986#action_12551237
> The templates, serializers and other complexities that allow map-reduce to 
> use arbitrary types complicate the design and lead to lots of object creates 
> and other overhead that a byte oriented design would not suffer.  I believe 
> the lowest level implementation of hadoop map-reduce should have byte string 
> oriented APIs (for keys and values).  This API would be more performant, 
> simpler and more easily cross language.
> The existing API could be maintained as a thin layer on top of the leaner API.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to