[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12838185#action_12838185
]
Arun C Murthy commented on MAPREDUCE-1221:
------------------------------------------
I think Hong is right, this is a duplicate of MAPREDUCE-257.
Anyway,
bq. Correct me if I am wrong. Kill a task will not make the job fail. It is
different from failing a task. So the 4th attempt gets killed will not fail the
job. Also, if it gets killed, it is likely that itself is the rough task
because it uses the highest amount of memory.
Now I'm really worried. If tasks, and hence jobs, are not penalized i.e. killed
rather than failed, what is the incentive for the authors of the *bad*
applications to be fix them? If they are just killed the same tasks will be run
over and over again without any penalty - there are no disincentives!
> Kill tasks on a node if the free physical memory on that machine falls below
> a configured threshold
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MAPREDUCE-1221
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1221
> Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: tasktracker
> Affects Versions: 0.22.0
> Reporter: dhruba borthakur
> Assignee: Scott Chen
> Fix For: 0.22.0
>
> Attachments: MAPREDUCE-1221-v1.patch, MAPREDUCE-1221-v2.patch,
> MAPREDUCE-1221-v3.patch
>
>
> The TaskTracker currently supports killing tasks if the virtual memory of a
> task exceeds a set of configured thresholds. I would like to extend this
> feature to enable killing tasks if the physical memory used by that task
> exceeds a certain threshold.
> On a certain operating system (guess?), if user space processes start using
> lots of memory, the machine hangs and dies quickly. This means that we would
> like to prevent map-reduce jobs from triggering this condition. From my
> understanding, the killing-based-on-virtual-memory-limits (HADOOP-5883) were
> designed to address this problem. This works well when most map-reduce jobs
> are Java jobs and have well-defined -Xmx parameters that specify the max
> virtual memory for each task. On the other hand, if each task forks off
> mappers/reducers written in other languages (python/php, etc), the total
> virtual memory usage of the process-subtree varies greatly. In these cases,
> it is better to use kill-tasks-using-physical-memory-limits.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
