[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839921#action_12839921 ]
Rodrigo Schmidt commented on MAPREDUCE-1510: -------------------------------------------- Hudson is taking too long to generate a report on this one, so I'm doing the testing myself. ant test-patch returned the following: [exec] There appear to be 0 release audit warnings before the patch and 0 release audit warnings after applying the patch. [exec] [exec] [exec] [exec] [exec] +1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 12 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] [exec] [exec] [exec] [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] Finished build. [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] ====================================================================== Now I'm running the unit tests > RAID should regenerate parity files if they get deleted > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: MAPREDUCE-1510 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1510 > Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/raid > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Attachments: MAPREDUCE-1510.1.patch, MAPREDUCE-1510.2.patch, > MAPREDUCE-1510.patch > > > Currently, if a source file has a replication factor lower or equal to that > expected by RAID, the file is skipped and no parity file is generated. I > don't think this is a good behavior since parity files can get wrongly > deleted, leaving the source file with a low replication factor. In that case, > raid should be able to recreate the parity file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.