[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851932#action_12851932
 ] 

dhruba borthakur commented on MAPREDUCE-1221:
---------------------------------------------

Hi amareshwari, you bring up a good point that a failed/killed task might get 
re-executed on the same machine. But this actually depends on the scheduler 
that one uses. I agree that the schedulers should be intelligent enough to not 
schedule the same task on the same machine on which it had scheduled the same 
task earlier (if there are other equivalent resources available). This isue 
does not seem to be directly related to this JIRA, isn't it?

> Kill tasks on a node if the free physical memory on that machine falls below 
> a configured threshold
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-1221
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1221
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: tasktracker
>    Affects Versions: 0.22.0
>            Reporter: dhruba borthakur
>            Assignee: Scott Chen
>             Fix For: 0.22.0
>
>         Attachments: MAPREDUCE-1221-v1.patch, MAPREDUCE-1221-v2.patch, 
> MAPREDUCE-1221-v3.patch, MAPREDUCE-1221-v4.patch
>
>
> The TaskTracker currently supports killing tasks if the virtual memory of a 
> task exceeds a set of configured thresholds. I would like to extend this 
> feature to enable killing tasks if the physical memory used by that task 
> exceeds a certain threshold.
> On a certain operating system (guess?), if user space processes start using 
> lots of memory, the machine hangs and dies quickly. This means that we would 
> like to prevent map-reduce jobs from triggering this condition. From my 
> understanding, the killing-based-on-virtual-memory-limits (HADOOP-5883) were 
> designed to address this problem. This works well when most map-reduce jobs 
> are Java jobs and have well-defined -Xmx parameters that specify the max 
> virtual memory for each task. On the other hand, if each task forks off 
> mappers/reducers written in other languages (python/php, etc), the total 
> virtual memory usage of the process-subtree varies greatly. In these cases, 
> it is better to use kill-tasks-using-physical-memory-limits.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to