[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Harsh J Chouraria updated MAPREDUCE-2236:
-----------------------------------------

    Attachment: MAPREDUCE-2236.r1.diff

Patch that caps maximum attempts at 100.

> No task may execute due to an Integer overflow possibility
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-2236
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2236
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.20.2
>         Environment: Linux, Hadoop 0.20.2
>            Reporter: Harsh J Chouraria
>            Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.23.0
>
>         Attachments: MAPREDUCE-2236.r1.diff
>
>
> If the attempts is configured to use Integer.MAX_VALUE, an overflow occurs 
> inside TaskInProgress, and thereby no task is attempted by the cluster and 
> the map tasks stay in pending state forever.
> For example, here's a job driver that causes this:
> {code}
> import java.io.IOException;
> import org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSDataOutputStream;
> import org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem;
> import org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path;
> import org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileInputFormat;
> import org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient;
> import org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf;
> import org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TextInputFormat;
> import org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.IdentityMapper;
> import org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.NullOutputFormat;
> @SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
> public class IntegerOverflow {
>       /**
>        * @param args
>        * @throws IOException 
>        */
>       @SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
>       public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
>               JobConf conf = new JobConf();
>               
>               Path inputPath = new Path("ignore");
>               FileSystem fs = FileSystem.get(conf);
>               if (!fs.exists(inputPath)) {
>                       FSDataOutputStream out = fs.create(inputPath);
>                       out.writeChars("Test");
>                       out.close();
>               }
>               
>               conf.setInputFormat(TextInputFormat.class);
>               conf.setOutputFormat(NullOutputFormat.class);
>               FileInputFormat.addInputPath(conf, inputPath);
>               
>               conf.setMapperClass(IdentityMapper.class);
>               conf.setNumMapTasks(1);
>               // Problem inducing line follows.
>               conf.setMaxMapAttempts(Integer.MAX_VALUE);
>               
>               // No reducer in this test, although setMaxReduceAttempts leads 
> to the same problem.
>               conf.setNumReduceTasks(0);
>               
>               JobClient.runJob(conf);
>       }
> }
> {code}
> The above code will not let any map task run. Additionally, a log would be 
> created inside JobTracker logs with the following information that clearly 
> shows the overflow:
> {code}
> 2010-12-30 00:59:07,836 WARN org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskInProgress: 
> Exceeded limit of -2147483648 (plus 0 killed) attempts for the tip 
> 'task_201012300058_0001_m_000000'
> {code}
> The issue lies inside the TaskInProgress class 
> (/o/a/h/mapred/TaskInProgress.java), at line 1018 (trunk), part of the 
> getTaskToRun(String taskTracker) method.
> {code}
>   public Task getTaskToRun(String taskTracker) throws IOException {   
>     // Create the 'taskid'; do not count the 'killed' tasks against the job!
>     TaskAttemptID taskid = null;
>     /* ============ THIS LINE v ====================================== */
>     if (nextTaskId < (MAX_TASK_EXECS + maxTaskAttempts + numKilledTasks)) {
>     /* ============ THIS LINE ^====================================== */
>       // Make sure that the attempts are unqiue across restarts
>       int attemptId = job.getNumRestarts() * NUM_ATTEMPTS_PER_RESTART + 
> nextTaskId;
>       taskid = new TaskAttemptID( id, attemptId);
>       ++nextTaskId;
>     } else {
>       LOG.warn("Exceeded limit of " + (MAX_TASK_EXECS + maxTaskAttempts) +
>               " (plus " + numKilledTasks + " killed)"  + 
>               " attempts for the tip '" + getTIPId() + "'");
>       return null;
>     }
> {code}
> Since all three variables being added are integer in type, one of them being 
> Integer.MAX_VALUE makes the condition fail with an overflow, thereby logging 
> and returning a null as the result is negative.
> One solution would be to make one of these variables into a long, so the 
> addition does not overflow?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to