[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13101306#comment-13101306
 ] 

Owen O'Malley commented on MAPREDUCE-2764:
------------------------------------------

Daryn, the service is set by the DelegationTokenFetcher, since it has to happen 
over there anyways.

The service isn't a generic field that is required to be <host>:<port>, it is 
for the use of each kind of token. The current tokens use that format, but it 
isn't a requirement. Obviously a shared library of methods to help are a good 
thing and should be used.

That said, the current SecurityUtil class needs cleanup to remove all of the 
redundant methods and provide a much cleaner and better documented abstraction.

> Fix renewal of dfs delegation tokens
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-2764
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2764
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Daryn Sharp
>            Assignee: Owen O'Malley
>             Fix For: 0.20.205.0
>
>         Attachments: MAPREDUCE-2764-2.patch, MAPREDUCE-2764-3.patch, 
> MAPREDUCE-2764-4.patch, MAPREDUCE-2764.patch, delegation.patch, 
> token-renew.patch, token-renew.patch
>
>
> The JT may have issues renewing hftp tokens which disrupt long distcp jobs.  
> The problem is the JT's delegation token renewal code is built on brittle 
> assumptions.  The token's service field contains only the "ip:port" pair.  
> The renewal process assumes that the scheme must be hdfs.  If that fails due 
> to a {{VersionMismatchException}}, it tries https based on another assumption 
> that it must be hftp if it's not hdfs.  A number of other exceptions, most 
> commonly {{IOExceptions}}, can be generated which fouls up the renewal since 
> it won't fallback to https.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to