[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-3893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Eric Payne updated MAPREDUCE-3893:
----------------------------------

    Priority: Critical  (was: Major)

I am marking this as critical because the deadlock situation is a real 
possibility when one queue is dedicated to one user that submits a large number 
of jobs simultaneously in a currently quiet cluster. We have a particular use 
case (GDM) that encounters this situation rebularly.
                
> allow capacity scheduler configs maximum-applications and 
> maximum-am-resource-percent configurable on a per queue basis
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-3893
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-3893
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: mrv2
>    Affects Versions: 0.23.0
>            Reporter: Thomas Graves
>            Priority: Critical
>
> The capacity scheduler configs for  maximum-applications and 
> maximum-am-resource-percent are currently configured globally and then made 
> proportional to each queue based on its capacity. There are times when this 
> may not work well.  some exampless -  if you have a queue that is running on 
> uberAM jobs, the jobs a queue is running always has a small number of 
> containers, and then you have the opposite where in a queue with very small 
> capacity, you may want to limit the am resources even more so you don't end 
> up deadlocked with all your capacity being used for app masters.
> I think we should make those configurable on a per queue basis.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to