[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-4562?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jarek Jarcec Cecho updated MAPREDUCE-4562:
------------------------------------------

    Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)
    
> Support for "FileSystemCounter" legacy counter group name for compatibility 
> reasons is creating incorrect counter name
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-4562
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-4562
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha, 0.23.1, 0.23.0
>            Reporter: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>         Attachments: MAPREDUCE-4562.patch
>
>
> Hi Guys,
> I was investigating issue in Sqoop project(http://sqoop.apache.org/). Problem 
> is that we are reporting number of written filesystem bytes back to the user 
> and on Hadoop 0.23/2.x we're always getting 0. I've noticed that there was 
> some refactorization in FileSystem counter related code and found 
> MAPREDUCE-3542 requesting backward compatibility.
> Included patch seems to be adding counter "FileSystemCounter":
> {code:title=hadoop-mapreduce-client-core/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapreduce/counters/AbstractCounters.java:84}
> legacyMap.put("FileSystemCounter", FileSystemCounter.class.getName());
> {code}
> But it appears that original name is "FileSystemCounters" (Notice the plural 
> "s" at the end of name):
> {code:title=src/mapred/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/Task.java:91 (0.20.2)}
> protected static final String FILESYSTEM_COUNTER_GROUP = "FileSystemCounters";
> {code}
> {code:title=src/mapred/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/Task.java:109 (1.0.3)}
> protected static final String FILESYSTEM_COUNTER_GROUP = "FileSystemCounters";
> {code}
> I therefore believe that this counter should be renamed in order to provide 
> backward compatibility. I might fix this discrepancy in Sqoop, but I believe 
> that other projects/users might also be affected and therefore it would be 
> better to fix it in upstream.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to