[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-4893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13567157#comment-13567157
 ] 

Hudson commented on MAPREDUCE-4893:
-----------------------------------

Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #3301 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/3301/])
    MAPREDUCE-4893. Fixed MR ApplicationMaster to do optimal assignment of 
containers to get maximum locality. Contributed by Bikas Saha. (Revision 
1440749)

     Result = SUCCESS
vinodkv : 
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1440749
Files : 
* /hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-mapreduce-project/CHANGES.txt
* 
/hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-mapreduce-project/hadoop-mapreduce-client/hadoop-mapreduce-client-app/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapreduce/v2/app/rm/RMContainerAllocator.java
* 
/hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-mapreduce-project/hadoop-mapreduce-client/hadoop-mapreduce-client-app/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapreduce/v2/app/TestRMContainerAllocator.java

                
> MR AppMaster can do sub-optimal assignment of containers to map tasks leading 
> to poor node locality
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-4893
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-4893
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: applicationmaster
>            Reporter: Bikas Saha
>            Assignee: Bikas Saha
>             Fix For: 2.0.3-alpha
>
>         Attachments: MAPREDUCE-4893.1.patch, MAPREDUCE-4893.2.patch, 
> MAPREDUCE-4893.3.patch
>
>
> Say the MR AppMaster asks the RM for 3 containers on nodes n1, n2 and n3. 
> There are 10 node n1-n10 in the same rack. The RM can give it allocated 
> containers in the list order n5, n2, n1. The way AM map->container assignment 
> happens, the AM will try to assign node local maps to n5, failing which it 
> will assign rack local maps to n5. These rack local maps could be node local 
> on n2 and n1 and would have been assigned to containers on n1 and n2 if the 
> AM had not made an early rack local match for them on n5. This can lead to 
> poor locality.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to