[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13671571#comment-13671571
]
Hadoop QA commented on MAPREDUCE-5268:
--------------------------------------
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12585626/mr-5268.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 2 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in
hadoop-mapreduce-project/hadoop-mapreduce-client/hadoop-mapreduce-client-hs.
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-MAPREDUCE-Build/3709//testReport/
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-MAPREDUCE-Build/3709//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Improve history server startup performance
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MAPREDUCE-5268
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5268
> Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: jobhistoryserver
> Affects Versions: 0.23.7, 2.0.4-alpha
> Reporter: Jason Lowe
> Assignee: Karthik Kambatla
> Attachments: mr-5268.patch, mr-5268.patch, mr-5268.patch,
> mr-5268.patch, mr-5268-prelim.patch
>
>
> The history server can easily take many minutes to startup when there are a
> significant number of jobs to scan in the done directory. However the
> scanning of files is not the bottleneck, rather it's the heavy use of
> ConcurrentSkipListMap.size in HistoryFileManager.
> ConcurrentSkipListMap.size is a very expensive operation, especially on maps
> with many entries, as it has to scan every entry to compute the size. We
> should avoid calling this method or at least minimize its use.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
