[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13726469#comment-13726469
]
Jason Lowe commented on MAPREDUCE-5399:
---------------------------------------
I don't see the trunk patch attached to this JIRA. Could you attach it? Once
it's attached, the Jenkins bot will notice it and can comment on it, and others
can review it as well.
Usually we iterate on the trunk patch before worrying about other branches,
because normally changes go through trunk and later versions before earlier
versions. This helps prevent the situation where an older Hadoop version has
the fix but it's missing from a later version. Often the trunk patch will
apply to the 2.x line as-is, and we can work on the 1.x patch after iterating
on the trunk version.
> Large number of map tasks cause slow sort at reduce phase, invariant to
> amount of data to sort
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MAPREDUCE-5399
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5399
> Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: mrv1, mrv2
> Affects Versions: 1.1.0, 2.0.2-alpha
> Reporter: Stanislav Barton
> Assignee: Stanislav Barton
> Priority: Critical
>
> We are using hadoop-2.0.0+1357-1.cdh4.3.0.p0.21 with MRv1. After upgrade from
> 4.1.2 to 4.3.0, I have noticed some performance deterioration in our MR job
> in the Reduce phase. The MR job has usually 10 000 map tasks (10 000 files on
> input each about 100MB) and 6 000 reducers (one reducer per table region). I
> was trying to figure out what at which phase the slow down appears (firstly I
> suspected that the slow gathering of the 10000 map output files is the
> culprit) and found out that the problem is not reading the map output (the
> shuffle) but the sort/merge phase that follows - the last and actual reduce
> phase is fast. I have tried to up the io.sort.factor because I thought the
> lots of small files are being merged on disk, but again upping that to 1000
> didnt do any difference. I have then printed the stack trace and found out
> that the problem is initialization of the
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.IFileInputStream namely the creation of the
> Configuration object which is not propagated along from earlier context, see
> the stack trace:
> Thread 13332: (state = IN_NATIVE)
> - java.io.UnixFileSystem.getBooleanAttributes0(java.io.File) @bci=0
> (Compiled frame; information may be imprecise)
> - java.io.UnixFileSystem.getBooleanAttributes(java.io.File) @bci=2, line=228
> (Compiled frame)
> - java.io.File.exists() @bci=20, line=733 (Compiled frame)
> - sun.misc.URLClassPath$FileLoader.getResource(java.lang.String, boolean)
> @bci=136, line=999 (Compiled frame)
> - sun.misc.URLClassPath$FileLoader.findResource(java.lang.String, boolean)
> @bci=3, line=966 (Compiled frame)
> - sun.misc.URLClassPath.findResource(java.lang.String, boolean) @bci=17,
> line=146 (Compiled frame)
> - java.net.URLClassLoader$2.run() @bci=12, line=385 (Compiled frame)
> -
> java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(java.security.PrivilegedAction,
> java.security.AccessControlContext) @bci=0 (Compiled frame)
> - java.net.URLClassLoader.findResource(java.lang.String) @bci=13, line=382
> (Compiled frame)
> - java.lang.ClassLoader.getResource(java.lang.String) @bci=30, line=1002
> (Compiled frame)
> - java.lang.ClassLoader.getResourceAsStream(java.lang.String) @bci=2,
> line=1192 (Compiled frame)
> - javax.xml.parsers.SecuritySupport$4.run() @bci=26, line=96 (Compiled frame)
> -
> java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(java.security.PrivilegedAction)
> @bci=0 (Compiled frame)
> -
> javax.xml.parsers.SecuritySupport.getResourceAsStream(java.lang.ClassLoader,
> java.lang.String) @bci=10, line=89 (Compiled frame)
> - javax.xml.parsers.FactoryFinder.findJarServiceProvider(java.lang.String)
> @bci=38, line=250 (Interpreted frame)
> - javax.xml.parsers.FactoryFinder.find(java.lang.String, java.lang.String)
> @bci=273, line=223 (Interpreted frame)
> - javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance() @bci=4, line=123
> (Compiled frame)
> - org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResource(java.util.Properties,
> org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration$Resource, boolean) @bci=16, line=1890
> (Compiled frame)
> - org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResources(java.util.Properties,
> java.util.ArrayList, boolean) @bci=49, line=1867 (Compiled frame)
> - org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getProps() @bci=43, line=1785
> (Compiled frame)
> - org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.get(java.lang.String) @bci=35,
> line=712 (Compiled frame)
> - org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getTrimmed(java.lang.String) @bci=2,
> line=731 (Compiled frame)
> - org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getBoolean(java.lang.String, boolean)
> @bci=2, line=1047 (Interpreted frame)
> - org.apache.hadoop.mapred.IFileInputStream.<init>(java.io.InputStream,
> long, org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration) @bci=111, line=93 (Interpreted
> frame)
> -
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.IFile$Reader.<init>(org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration,
> org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSDataInputStream, long,
> org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.CompressionCodec,
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Counters$Counter) @bci=60, line=303 (Interpreted
> frame)
> -
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.IFile$InMemoryReader.<init>(org.apache.hadoop.mapred.RamManager,
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskAttemptID, byte[], int, int) @bci=11, line=480
> (Interpreted frame)
> -
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier.createInMemorySegments(java.util.List,
> long) @bci=133, line=2416 (Interpreted frame)
> - org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier.createKVIterator()
> @bci=669, line=2530 (Interpreted frame)
> - org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask.run(org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf,
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskUmbilicalProtocol) @bci=513, line=425
> (Interpreted frame)
> - org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child$4.run() @bci=29, line=268 (Interpreted
> frame)
> -
> java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(java.security.PrivilegedExceptionAction,
> java.security.AccessControlContext) @bci=0 (Interpreted frame)
> - javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(javax.security.auth.Subject,
> java.security.PrivilegedExceptionAction) @bci=42, line=396 (Interpreted frame)
> -
> org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(java.security.PrivilegedExceptionAction)
> @bci=14, line=1408 (Interpreted frame)
> - org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(java.lang.String[]) @bci=776, line=262
> (Interpreted frame)
> A blank configuration object is created at IFileInputStream. I have made a
> test and found out that this operation costs about 10-15ms depending on the
> load on the system, because it goes to the local FS to load the properties!!!
> This is to my opinion a bug since in the context the configuration (of the
> job) is known and could be reused at that point. My problem (and every others
> who has big number of reducer and mapper tasks) is that for 10K map taks it
> does 10000 x 15 = 150 seconds just to find out that there is nothing to sort.
> The overhead should be normally zero.
> At this moment, the 10-15ms problem is amplified by 6 000 reducers so the
> bottom line is that my reduce phase is at least 1.6 hours longer than it
> should be.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
