[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Todd Lipcon updated MAPREDUCE-2841:
-----------------------------------
Attachment: MR-2841benchmarks.pdf
Attached a report with various benchmark results from running on a 5-node
cluster. I also wrote up and graphed the microbenchmark.
The results don't quite match up with my comment above (but are still good).
The reason for the discrepancy is that in my comment above, I was running on my
laptop (recent Haswell CPU). In this PDF, I'm running on machines in our
datacenter which have an older chipset and lower clock rate.
If anyone would like any further benchmarks or cluster validations done, please
let me know ASAP. Thanks.
> Task level native optimization
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: MAPREDUCE-2841
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2841
> Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: task
> Environment: x86-64 Linux/Unix
> Reporter: Binglin Chang
> Assignee: Sean Zhong
> Attachments: DESIGN.html, MAPREDUCE-2841.v1.patch,
> MAPREDUCE-2841.v2.patch, MR-2841benchmarks.pdf, dualpivot-0.patch,
> dualpivotv20-0.patch, fb-shuffle.patch,
> hadoop-3.0-mapreduce-2841-2014-7-17.patch, micro-benchmark.txt
>
>
> I'm recently working on native optimization for MapTask based on JNI.
> The basic idea is that, add a NativeMapOutputCollector to handle k/v pairs
> emitted by mapper, therefore sort, spill, IFile serialization can all be done
> in native code, preliminary test(on Xeon E5410, jdk6u24) showed promising
> results:
> 1. Sort is about 3x-10x as fast as java(only binary string compare is
> supported)
> 2. IFile serialization speed is about 3x of java, about 500MB/s, if hardware
> CRC32C is used, things can get much faster(1G/
> 3. Merge code is not completed yet, so the test use enough io.sort.mb to
> prevent mid-spill
> This leads to a total speed up of 2x~3x for the whole MapTask, if
> IdentityMapper(mapper does nothing) is used
> There are limitations of course, currently only Text and BytesWritable is
> supported, and I have not think through many things right now, such as how to
> support map side combine. I had some discussion with somebody familiar with
> hive, it seems that these limitations won't be much problem for Hive to
> benefit from those optimizations, at least. Advices or discussions about
> improving compatibility are most welcome:)
> Currently NativeMapOutputCollector has a static method called canEnable(),
> which checks if key/value type, comparator type, combiner are all compatible,
> then MapTask can choose to enable NativeMapOutputCollector.
> This is only a preliminary test, more work need to be done. I expect better
> final results, and I believe similar optimization can be adopt to reduce task
> and shuffle too.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
