[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14170038#comment-14170038
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on MAPREDUCE-5873:
--------------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12674604/MAPREDUCE-5873.v7.patch
  against trunk revision 178bc50.

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 1 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:red}-1 javac{color:red}.  The patch appears to cause the build to 
fail.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-MAPREDUCE-Build/4957//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Measure bw of a single copy call and display the correct aggregated bw
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-5873
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5873
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.0
>            Reporter: Siqi Li
>            Assignee: Siqi Li
>         Attachments: MAPREDUCE-5873.v1.patch, MAPREDUCE-5873.v2.patch, 
> MAPREDUCE-5873.v3.patch, MAPREDUCE-5873.v4.patch, MAPREDUCE-5873.v5.patch, 
> MAPREDUCE-5873.v6.patch, MAPREDUCE-5873.v7.patch
>
>
> Currently ShuffleScheduler in ReduceTask JVM status displays bandwidth. Its 
> definition however is confusing because it captures the time where there is 
> no copying because there is a pause between when new wave of map outputs is 
> available.
> current bw is definded as (bytes copied so far) / (total time in the copy 
> phase so far)
> It would be more useful 
> 1) to measure bandwidth of a single copy call.
> 2) display aggregated bw as long as there is at least one fetcher is in the 
> copy call.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to