[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14565608#comment-14565608
 ] 

Craig Welch commented on MAPREDUCE-6302:
----------------------------------------

[~kasha] this looks good to me overall, it would be great to have this to avoid 
deadlocks as such, at least as a last resort.  I agree with [~wangda] that it 
would be good to be able to disable this with a value like -1, but I think 
you're setting the default to not be disabled (looks like you have 5 minutes) 
is the way to go - by default I think it is best to have this active.  I 
actually think seconds is the right granularity here, the time factor of 
relevance for this sort of activity is really not in the MS range.  I also 
think the naming you have for the configuration option is fine, esp. in 
contrast to the other (existing) delay it makes sense.

Do you think you could add a test or two?

> deadlock in a job between map and reduce cores allocation 
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-6302
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6302
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>            Reporter: mai shurong
>            Assignee: Karthik Kambatla
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: AM_log_head100000.txt.gz, AM_log_tail100000.txt.gz, 
> log.txt, mr-6302-prelim.patch, queue_with_max163cores.png, 
> queue_with_max263cores.png, queue_with_max333cores.png
>
>
> I submit a  big job, which has 500 maps and 350 reduce, to a 
> queue(fairscheduler) with 300 max cores. When the big mapreduce job is 
> running 100% maps, the 300 reduces have occupied 300 max cores in the queue. 
> And then, a map fails and retry, waiting for a core, while the 300 reduces 
> are waiting for failed map to finish. So a deadlock occur. As a result, the 
> job is blocked, and the later job in the queue cannot run because no 
> available cores in the queue.
> I think there is the similar issue for memory of a queue .



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to