Hi Bjorn, +1 That sounds great! This would be a new "native" MapServer data source rather than going through GDAL/OGR, is that correct? It would need a few msautotests and docs, but I can try and help/test.
Seth -- web:https://geographika.net twitter: @geographika On Mon, Apr 25, 2022, at 10:57 PM, Björn Harrtell wrote: > Hi mapserver devs! > > I got interested in the subject because of the tests made recently by Jeff > that shows the potential of the format. I believe it should be possible to > get significant additional performance out of FlatGeobuf in MapServer if it > was built in just like Shapefile support is. > > FlatGeobuf C++ implementation is rather small, doesn't require any > dependencies, and I don't expect it to require any invasive changes to > existing code. > > Would love to get started on this ASAP, if there are no objections. :) > > Regards, > Björn Harrtell > _______________________________________________ > MapServer-dev mailing list > MapServer-dev@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev >
_______________________________________________ MapServer-dev mailing list MapServer-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
