Hello list, I`m testing MapServer with fast-cgi to see if there`s a benefit in performance.
I succesfully compiled MapServer with fast-cgi, in my Apache 2.2 at Debian Etch the mod_fastcgi is activated, the httpd.conf has the needed entries and in my mapfile I set PROCESSING "CLOSE_CONNECTION=DEFER" to a very "expensive" Layer (the data are shapefiles). But if I check the performance with "siege" (siege -c 4 -r 10 http://localhost/cgi-bin/mapserv?map=/var/www/wms_ogc/wms_server.map) I don`t see any performance benefits in comparison to MapServer without fastcgi?? Am I do something wrong?? What is the benefit of fast-cgi? Should`t it be faster than "normal"-cgi? Thank you very much in advance, Kai -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
