No, I don't think mod_fcgi will change the performance profile much. BTW, I think that the number of workers you should have is ncores + X where 1 <= X <= 3, thereabouts.
P. On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Ramsey ha scritto: >> >> Andrea, >> >> You might want to try mod_fcgi instead, as it has received maintenance >> and is targetted at Apache 2, whereas the original mod_fastcgi was >> built for 1.3 and received a cursory upgrade to 2. >> >> http://fastcgi.coremail.cn/ >> >> That said, I have not experienced your problem before. > > Ah, thanks a ton Paul. In the meantime I tried out > the FastCgiServer directive, I made it create 20 processes > and it works as advertised (actually my benchmarks show > MapServer got damn faster than last year, way to go). > > Do you believe that trying out mod_fgci will give better > result, or in any case more realistic ones? (not sure > you'd want to keep 20 mapserver processes around statically, > thought they don't seem to be eating that much memory). > > Cheers > Andrea > _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users