emm, I mean, did you *added* the DEFRESOLUTION 99 ? and not replaced the 
RESOLUTION 99. You should have both.

Alan

On January 12, 2010 03:35:00 pm Carlos Ruiz wrote:
> Hey Alan,
> 
> 
> Using DEFRESOLUTION 99 now makes all the labels smaller than they was.
> 
> Any other idea ?
> Thanks for helping me on this issue
> 
> 
> IC Carlos Ruiz
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Alan Boudreault <aboudrea...@mapgears.com>
> To: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
> Cc: Carlos Ruiz <boolean10...@yahoo.com>; "Lime, Steve D (DNR)"
>  <steve.l...@state.mn.us> Sent: Tue, January 12, 2010 1:43:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [mapserver-users] 5.6.1 version and labels
> 
> Carlos, you haven't attached the images.
> 
> What's happen if you add the following line into your map definition:
> 
> DEFRESOLUTION 99
> 
> Alan
> 
> On January 12, 2010 02:26:18 pm Carlos Ruiz wrote:
> > Thanks Steve,
> >
> > Lets see something simple that is changing in the new Mapserver version,
> >  here's the LAYER definition:
> >
> > LAYER
> >
> >     NAME "my name"
> >     TYPE annotation
> >     STATUS ON
> >     TRANSFORM ll
> >     UNITS PIXELS
> >
> >       FEATURE
> >           POINTS
> >               135 -10
> >         END
> >         TEXT "my text"
> >       END
> >
> >       CLASS
> >         LABEL
> >               FONT "arial"
> >               TYPE TRUETYPE
> >               SIZE 8
> >               BUFFER 1
> >               COLOR 0 0 0
> >               BACKGROUNDCOLOR 255 255 255
> >               FORCE TRUE
> >         END
> >     END
> >
> > END
> >
> > And now the MAP definition:
> >
> > MAP
> >
> >     EXTENT 427469.4518 2086656.9173 860880.8507 2523277.2962
> >     FONTSET "fonts/fonts.txt"
> >     SYMBOLSET "symbols.txt"
> >     SIZE 640 480
> >     STATUS ON
> >
> >     OUTPUTFORMAT
> >         NAME jpeg
> >         DRIVER "GD/JPEG"
> >         MIMETYPE "image/jpeg"
> >         IMAGEMODE RGB
> >         EXTENSION "jpg"
> >         FORMATOPTION "QUALITY=80"
> >     END
> >
> >     QUERYMAP
> >         COLOR 255 255 0
> >         STYLE NORMAL
> >     END
> >
> >     RESOLUTION 99
> >
> >     UNITS meters
> >
> > I've attached how it looks with the 5.4 version (before.jpg) and how it
> >  looks now with the 5.6.1 version (after.jpg).
> >
> > Hope this helps you to find this strange behavior
> >
> > Thanks in advance !
> >
> >
> > IC Carlos Ruiz
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: "Lime, Steve D (DNR)" <steve.l...@state.mn.us>
> > To: Carlos Ruiz <boolean10...@yahoo.com>;
> > "mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org" <mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org> Sent:
> > Mon, January 11, 2010 3:55:08 PM Subject: RE: [mapserver-users] 5.6.1
> > version and labels
> >
> >
> > What does your layer def look like? What renderer are you using?
> > Are you setting a specific RESOLUTION? There may be some subtle sizing
> >  changes but I haven’t run across anything significant yet.
> >
> > Before and after images are helpful too.
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > From:mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
> >  [mailto:mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Carlos
> > Ruiz Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 3:43 PM
> > To: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
> > Subject: [mapserver-users] 5.6.1 version and labels
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have updated my Mapserver version from 5.4 to 5.6.0 (and later to 5.6.1
> > because the queries). There's something odd with the labels because
> > appears bigger than i had defined.
> >
> > Does anybody knows why ?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> > IC
> > Carlos Ruiz
> 

-- 
Alan Boudreault
Mapgears
http://www.mapgears.com
_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users

Reply via email to