Hi Thomas,

I believe we are using fribidi but I am not sure which version, I will
look further into this and report back to with my findings.

Thank You,


Peter Mallen

-----Original Message-----
From: mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of
mapserver-users-requ...@lists.osgeo.org
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 7:18 AM
To: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: mapserver-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 28

Send mapserver-users mailing list submissions to
        mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        mapserver-users-requ...@lists.osgeo.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        mapserver-users-ow...@lists.osgeo.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of mapserver-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Hindi and Thai text rendering (thomas bonfort)
   2. [TinyOWS] TinyOWS 1.1.0 and the old good axis     order trouble
      (Rahkonen Jukka)
   3. Re: Raster color table (Daniel Morissette)
   4. Problem with Transparency and IMAGECOLOR (Johannes Weskamm)
   5. JPEG and OVERSAMPLE_RATIO (C?dric MOULLET)
   6. Re: JPEG and OVERSAMPLE_RATIO (C?dric MOULLET)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:47:46 +0100
From: thomas bonfort <thomas.bonf...@gmail.com>
To: MapserverList OSGEO <mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [mapserver-users] Hindi and Thai text rendering
Message-ID:
        
<caom3y2iossdh2dcrntqeurhcojdh42w2vwunb3q0fzq5p2d...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:45 AM, thomas bonfort
<thomas.bonf...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Peter,
> We don't do any shaping directly inside mapserver, but rely on the 
> fribidi library to do that for us. Your mapfile definitions are 
> correct to activate this (i.e. it includes an LABEL.ENCODING
parameter).
> I'll leave it up to you to confirm that the image sample I sent you is

> correct or not. If so, check that you have configured your mapserver 
> with fribidi enabled and uptodate (the supplied image was rendered
with 0.19.2 .
> some stable distros use a very outdated fribidi version, so you might 
> need to upgrade manually) . If not, you can try with a bleeding edge 
> fribidi
> (0.19.5 was released a few days ago), and/or report the issue or find 
> help from the fribidi project directly.
>
> please report back with your findings.
>
> regards,
> thomas
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Peter Mallen
<peter.mal...@airborne.aero>wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> Here is a link to a png Image I have created of using the simple Map 
>> File I provided in the previous postings, this is exactly how the 
>> Hindi text is rendering in Map Server:
>> http://www.maplusplus.com/images/Hindi_Incorrect.png
>>
>> It is appearing incorrectly and should appear as shown in this link 
>> to Google Translate:
>> http://tinyurl.com/cqlymgy
>>
>> I am not sure if the Hindi you have provided is displaying correctly,

>> although it appears to be similar to what I looked up in Google
Translate.
>>
>>
>> Thank You for your help,
>>
>> Peter Mallen
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: thomas bonfort 
>> [mailto:thomas.bonf...@gmail.com<thomas.bonf...@gmail.com>
>> ]
>> Sent: Sat 12/15/2012 10:36 AM
>> To: Peter Mallen
>> Cc: MapserverList OSGEO
>> Subject: Re: [mapserver-users] Hindi and Thai text rendering
>>
>> Peter,
>> You don't provide the rendering that mapserver is producing, so it's 
>> difficult to compare. Is this rendering correct:
>>
http://osm.terriscope.fr/mapcache/tms/1.0.0/mapserver@g/15/23400/19085.p
ng?
>>
>> --
>> thomas
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Peter Mallen
>> <peter.mal...@airborne.aero>wrote:
>>
>> > Hello Everyone,
>> >
>> > I apologize for my previous posts as my url appears to have been 
>> > too long, I have converted the link to a tiny url:
>> > http://tinyurl.com/cqlymgy
>> >
>> > As a reminder, this is a link showing how the Hindi characters 
>> > should display.
>> >
>> > Thank You Again,
>> >
>> > Peter Mallen
>> >
>> >
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20121217/0
ff48ff6/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:16:06 +0000
From: Rahkonen Jukka <jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi>
To: "'Mapserver-Users (mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org)'"
        <mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: [mapserver-users] [TinyOWS] TinyOWS 1.1.0 and the old good
        axis    order trouble
Message-ID:
        <84446def76453c439e9e97e438e13a637c1...@suutari.haapa.mmm.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi,

I have been running TinyOWS r558 for quite a long time because it is
dealing almost right with the axis order of the projections I am
commonly using. Now I had a fast try with the current TinyOWS 1.1.0
version but unfortunately I realized that it is doing wrong thing by
flipping the axis with urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::3067. That system is
officially an Easting-Northing system and axis should not be flipped
ever.  Also, TinyOWS does not flip the axes with
urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::2393 which is officially a Northing-Easting system
and axis should be flipped with WFS 1.1.0

I can see that TinyOWS is flipping the axis with WFS 1.1.0 if I I give
srsName=urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::3067 or if I do not give it at all, which
means the same because the uri-format is the default srsName.  Axis
order is correct if I give it as srsName=EPSG:3067.  With EPSG:2393 axis
are not flipped with either srsName format. What should be done next is
to flip the behaviours of 2393 and 3067.

What is the logic that TinyOWS is using when it decides whether the axis
should be flipped or not  for WFS 1.1.0?  Can I manipulate TinyOWS
somehow myself to behave in a correct way with EPSG:2393 and EPSG:3067
by editing something in the PostGIS or in  TinyOWS sources?  Another
question is that is it guaranteed that axis order is handled similarly
everywhere, also in filters? I mean that can I trust that once TinyOWS
someday will again send  urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::2393 data as
Northing-Easting with WFS 1.1.0 it will then also treat the GML3 filters
so that is knows that first comes Northing and then Easting?  Does the
srsName format have the same meaning if filters, so that if short
srsName is used then axis order is always Easting-Northing or lon-lat,
but when the uri format is used then TinyOWS is trying to check the
official axis with WFS 1.1.0?

-Jukka Rahkonen-


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:03:04 -0500
From: Daniel Morissette <dmorisse...@mapgears.com>
To: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [mapserver-users] Raster color table
Message-ID: <50cf1808.2090...@mapgears.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

On 12-12-14 5:52 PM, ALT SHN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to associate a color table to a 8bit raster so 
> Mapserver doesn't render it in grayscale?
> In the Mapserver documentation, a pallete is refered, but for what I 
> understood, this applies to the output format, not to a particular
raster.
>
> Is there a workarround for this situation? (other than converting the 
> raster to RGB)
>

You could create a GDAL VRT file for your image in which you associate a
color table to the raster band, and then point your MapServer layer
definition to the VRT.

See:

http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/FAQRaster#Howtocreateormodifyanimagecolo
rtable

and

http://www.gdal.org/gdal_vrttut.html


--
Daniel Morissette
http://www.mapgears.com/
Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:15:50 +0100
From: Johannes Weskamm <wesk...@terrestris.de>
To: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [mapserver-users] Problem with Transparency and IMAGECOLOR
Message-ID: <50cf1b06.2060...@terrestris.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; Format="flowed"

Hi,

I have a question regarding the transparency of my mapfile together with

mapserver 6.2.
The documentation tells me, that using the Parameter IMAGECOLOR together

with TRANSPARENT ON in OUTPUTFORMAT, the resulting image of a wms 
request should have the defined color transparent.

I tried different approaches but none of them work.

So here is an example of my layer:

LAYER
     TYPE POLYGON
     STATUS ON
     GROUP "default"
     NAME "land"
     PROJECTION
         "init=epsg:900913"
     END
     DATA "../shapefiles/test"
     CLASS
         STYLE
             COLOR 255 255 0
         END
     END
END

The relevant Map parameters:

OUTPUTFORMAT
     NAME 'test'
     DRIVER GD/PNG
     IMAGEMODE PC256
     FORMATOPTION "INTERLACE=false"
     TRANSPARENT ON
END

IMAGECOLOR 255 255 0

I also tried agg/png drivers together with IMAGEMODE RGBA, but all 
combinations give me a yellow, non transparent response (i request the 
layer with transparent=true and image/png as format).

Can anyone give me an advice what i am doing wrong, or is this a bug?
Thanks,

J. Weskamm



-- 

Dipl.-Geogr. Johannes Weskamm
--- Anwendungsentwickler ---

terrestris GmbH & Co. KG
P?tzchens Chaussee 56
53227 Bonn

Tel:   +49 (0)228 / 96 28 99 -555
Fax:   +49 (0)228 / 96 28 99 -57

Email: wesk...@terrestris.de <mailto:wesk...@terrestris.de>
Web: http://www.terrestris.de

Amtsgericht Bonn, HRA 6835
Komplement?rin: terrestris Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH
vertreten durch: Hinrich Paulsen, Till Adams

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20121217/3
389856d/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:11:34 +0100
From: C?dric MOULLET <cedric.moul...@gmail.com>
To: mapserver-users <mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: [mapserver-users] JPEG and OVERSAMPLE_RATIO
Message-ID:
        
<cabcs5eglj8ah8rkepizlvturz0kntwie-chxllzu8qcypqr...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi,
The following issue has been observed with MapServer 6.0.3:

1. Very good quality for a PNG with RESAMPLE=BILINEAR and
OVERSAMPLE_RATIO=16:
[image:
http://wms-bgdi.bgdi.admin.ch/?lang=xx&LAYERS=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-gr
au-pk100_bazl&FORMAT=image%2Fpng&SERVICE=WMS&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=GetMa
p&STYLES=&SRS=EPSG%3A21781&BBOX=513184,143152,519840,149808&WIDTH=256&HE
IGHT=256]

2. Less good quality for a PNG or JPEG with default resampling settings:
[image:
http://wms-bgdi.bgdi.admin.ch/?lang=xx&LAYERS=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-gr
au-pk100_original&FORMAT=image%2Fpng&SERVICE=WMS&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=G
etMap&STYLES=&SRS=EPSG%3A21781&BBOX=513184,143152,519840,149808&WIDTH=25
6&HEIGHT=256]

3. Awful quality for JPEG with RESAMPLE=BILINEAR and
OVERSAMPLE_RATIO=16:
[image:
http://wms-bgdi.bgdi.admin.ch/?lang=xx&LAYERS=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-gr
au-pk100_bazl&FORMAT=image%2Fjpeg&SERVICE=WMS&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=GetM
ap&STYLES=&SRS=EPSG%3A21781&BBOX=513184,143152,519840,149808&WIDTH=256&H
EIGHT=256]

Any idea why the OVERSAMPLE_RATIO affects heavily the quality of JPEG
images ?

Thanks in advance for your help,
C?dric
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20121217/d
1d02050/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:18:00 +0100
From: C?dric MOULLET <cedric.moul...@gmail.com>
To: mapserver-users <mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [mapserver-users] JPEG and OVERSAMPLE_RATIO
Message-ID:
        
<cabcs5ehgj8gctcfg9tqbq9vt4iw2w3c9u4ltx7vomezeslu...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I realize that links have been sent and not pictures
Here are reachable links for the three cases:
1.
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/j_OClw5fGOeQE7K1wiimytMTjNZETYmyPJ
y0liipFm0?feat=directlink
2.
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/3q52h52EwOp9JzZm3KAWbNMTjNZETYmyPJ
y0liipFm0?feat=directlink
3.
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/GTAThw7AOVMK-j-7DWAabtMTjNZETYmyPJ
y0liipFm0?feat=directlink
C?dric


On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:11 PM, C?dric MOULLET
<cedric.moul...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
> The following issue has been observed with MapServer 6.0.3:
>
> 1. Very good quality for a PNG with RESAMPLE=BILINEAR and
> OVERSAMPLE_RATIO=16:
> [image:
>
http://wms-bgdi.bgdi.admin.ch/?lang=xx&LAYERS=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-gr
au-pk100_bazl&FORMAT=image%2Fpng&SERVICE=WMS&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=GetMa
p&STYLES=&SRS=EPSG%3A21781&BBOX=513184,143152,519840,149808&WIDTH=256&HE
IGHT=256]
>
> 2. Less good quality for a PNG or JPEG with default resampling
settings:
> [image:
>
http://wms-bgdi.bgdi.admin.ch/?lang=xx&LAYERS=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-gr
au-pk100_original&FORMAT=image%2Fpng&SERVICE=WMS&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=G
etMap&STYLES=&SRS=EPSG%3A21781&BBOX=513184,143152,519840,149808&WIDTH=25
6&HEIGHT=256]
>
> 3. Awful quality for JPEG with RESAMPLE=BILINEAR and
OVERSAMPLE_RATIO=16:
> [image:
>
http://wms-bgdi.bgdi.admin.ch/?lang=xx&LAYERS=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-gr
au-pk100_bazl&FORMAT=image%2Fjpeg&SERVICE=WMS&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=GetM
ap&STYLES=&SRS=EPSG%3A21781&BBOX=513184,143152,519840,149808&WIDTH=256&H
EIGHT=256]
>
> Any idea why the OVERSAMPLE_RATIO affects heavily the quality of JPEG
> images ?
>
> Thanks in advance for your help,
> C?dric
>



-- 
Political blog: http://cedricmoullet.blogspot.com/
Welcome to my world: http://www.cedricmoullet.com/
My Linked In profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cedricmoullet
Twitter: http://twitter.com/cedricmoullet
Home sweet home:
http://map.geo.admin.ch/?crosshair=bowl&zoom=11&X=185241.24219&Y=561288.
90625&bgOpacity=0&selectedNode=node_ch.swisstopo.fixpunkte-lage1
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20121217/4
402c513/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users


End of mapserver-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 28
***********************************************
_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users

Reply via email to