IMHO, if you do a SHAPEPATH at the layer level then you might as well just add 
the full-path to the DATA element. You’re not really gaining anything with the 
additional complexity. Did the idea of using runtime variables not pan out?

From: MapServer-users <mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org> On Behalf Of 
Jan Hartmann via MapServer-users
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 1:14 AM
To: Steve Lime <sdl...@gmail.com>
Cc: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [MapServer-users] multiple shapepaths

How about a shapepath at the layer level? I am combining 20 years of working 
with old maps in three (or four :-)) different countries (Netherlands, Germany 
and Flemish and Walloon Belgium), all in their own formats, projections, 
directories an servers. It would help to keep my applications (and my mind) 
clear if I could use the appropriate shapepaths. And as to portability, it is 
essential to use relative paths. Just try to move a website to a new server 
with a differently named filesystem, if all paths are hard coded.

Jan


Op 5 dec 2023 om 15:43 heeft Steve Lime 
<sdl...@gmail.com<mailto:sdl...@gmail.com>> het volgende geschreven:

It won’t work. A configuration is loaded in entirety first, and then applied as 
necessary.

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:21 AM Jan Hartmann via MapServer-users 
<mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org>> wrote:
Not sure. I cannot get it working anyway. Any ideas, Steve?

On 04/12/2023 10:10, Jörg Thomsen (WhereGroup) via MapServer-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not sure, but perhaps overwriting it, would work?
>
> MAP
>
>   shapepath 'blah'
>
>   Layer 1
>   Layer 2
>
>   shapepath 'blubb'
>
>   Layer 3
>   Layer 4
>
> Jörg
>
>
>
> Am 02.12.23 um 19:32 schrieb Jan Hartmann via MapServer-users:
>> Yes, that is what I sought, didn't know it was possible. Thanks!
>>
>> Jan
>>
>> On 02/12/2023 19:29, Steve Lime wrote:
>>> One other thought, you can use multiple paths via runtime subs to
>>> approximate what I think you’re looking for, so:
>>>
>>> WEB
>>>   VALIDATION
>>>     path1_default “/opt/path1”
>>>     path1 “^\/opt\/path1$”
>>>   path2_default “/opt/path2”
>>>   path2 “^\/opt\/path2$”
>>>   END
>>> END
>>>
>>> Then in DATA values you’d use %path1% or %path2%. This is another
>>> use case for variables that was suggested recently. We could,
>>> perhaps, define a way to mark something as immutable via url so the
>>> regex could be simplified and only the default would ever be used
>>> (e.g. “path2” “immutable”).
>>>
>>> —Steve
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:28 PM Steve Lime 
>>> <sdl...@gmail.com<mailto:sdl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Nope, just the one value.
>>>
>>>     On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 1:02 PM Jan Hartmann via MapServer-users
>>>     
>>> <mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org>> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Hi,
>>>
>>>         Is it possible to use multiple paths in a shapepath?
>>>         ./data1:./data2
>>>         does not work
>>>
>>>         Jan
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         MapServer-users mailing list
>>>         
>>> MapServer-users@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:MapServer-users@lists.osgeo.org>
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MapServer-users mailing list
>> MapServer-users@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:MapServer-users@lists.osgeo.org>
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>

_______________________________________________
MapServer-users mailing list
MapServer-users@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:MapServer-users@lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
_______________________________________________
MapServer-users mailing list
MapServer-users@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users

Reply via email to