Hey everyone, Sorry, a somewhat OT - This thread has piqued my interest a little. Would someone mind posting examples of aliased vs. antialiased images? I'm just curious about the results you can get.
Thanks! -Abe On 10/25/05, Dylan Beaudette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 25, 2005, at 2:54 AM, Flavio Hendry wrote: > > > Ciao Giorgio > > > > It might not be the antialiasing but the png24. png24 files tend to get > > very large, i.e. 400k compared to 70k as a JPEG (check your output > > directory). Maybe you try JPEG. > > > > However, I had quite problems with the antialiasing, working on some > > layer and on some the system hung (no error messages, just hanging when > > zooming). Removing the antialiasing from the layer worked. Strange > > behaviour, anybody having this problem? > > > > Mit freundlichem Gruss / Best Regards > > Flavio Hendry > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > TYDAC NEWS http://www.tydac.ch/german/index.php?menu=News_actual > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > ############ Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Kind Regards > > ############ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ############ TYDAC AG - http://www.tydac.ch > > #### #### Geographic Information Solutions > > #### #### Luternauweg 12 -- CH-3006 Bern > > ############ Tel +41 (0)31 368 0180 - Fax +41 (0)31 368 1860 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Yes. I am noticing a seemingly erratic behavior: If I enable > antialiasing with JPEG output format, it does not work. If I enable > antialiasing in a tiled line layer it does not work... > > Are there some good ground rules for antialiasing? i.e. ONLY PNG24, > etc. ? > > Thanks! > > -- > Dylan Beaudette > Soils and Biogeochemistry Graduate Group > University of California at Davis > 530.754.7341 >
