Maptitude - http://research.umbc.edu/~roswell/maptitude.html

Peter:
Thanks for your response.  You were right (as usual). 
By "un-checking" the box the shapefile was
successfully imported.  Of course, I fouled up the
projection so the city is now in no-where land and is
10 times its correct size, but that's my problem.
Thanks for your help.

Mike 
--- "Peter H. Van Demark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maptitude -
> http://research.umbc.edu/~roswell/maptitude.html
> 
> Mike:
> 
> >Recently I tried to open/import ArcView shapefiles
> in
> >Maptitude 4.1.  Some of the files opened (and
> >converted to .dbd) fine, but two larger ones
> returned
> >an error message and could not be opened.  FYI, one
> of
> >the shapefiles had about 225,000 records and 75
> >fields.  The file size was about 19 megs.  Has
> anyone
> >had a similar experience, could it be due to the
> size
> >of the files, and is there a way to fix the
> problem?
> 
> Were they areas? If so, the default is to build
> topology. By removing the 
> check from the Eliminate duplicate boundary lines
> box, the areas will be 
> imported as polygons, which requires far less
> processing and memory. There 
> will only be a few things that you cannot do with a
> non-topological .DBD 
> file, such as merging by value.
> 
> Peter
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
> Peter Van Demark
> Director of GIS Products and Training        Phone:
> 617-527-4700
> Caliper Corporation                            Fax:
> 617-527-5113
> 1172 Beacon Street                     E-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Newton MA 02461-9926            Web site:
> http://www.caliper.com
> 
> 
>
______________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to