Added #!srfi-237 (see personal repo). Do you think it will work for Gauche?
Am So., 6. Nov. 2022 um 22:23 Uhr schrieb Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <[email protected]>: > > Am So., 6. Nov. 2022 um 22:03 Uhr schrieb Shiro Kawai <[email protected]>: > > > > Ah, Gauche already uses #[...] for another purpose. > > Could it be an extension of srfi-10, e..g #,(<rtd> ....)? Oh, wait, that > > conflicts with R6RS. Hmm... > > The problem is that any sensible lexical syntax will probably conflict > with some existing syntax of some implementations. > > Maybe SRFI 237 should mention the possibility of a > > #!srfi-237 > > (or similar) directive (like #!fold-case), which presence would enable > SRFI 237-syntax in case the implementation does not support it in its > default reader mode. > > > By the way, if the record type has a protocol clause, would the reader > > bypass it? > > Yes. It's just a raw copy of the record's fields (and that's why only > non-opaque records are supported). > > PS: I still have to think about how to match unknown records with > syntax-case (if the generalization of syntax objects mentioned in SRFI > is adopted). > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2022 at 6:40 AM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> An external representation for non-generative, non-opaque records > >> (allowing simple serialization and deserialization) is now specified > >> in my latest commit (in the personal repo).
