Yes for SRFI 154, 155, and 157. Thanks! Arthur A. Gleckler <[email protected]> schrieb am Fr., 23. Juni 2023, 16:37:
> CC-ing the list. > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 7:36 AM Arthur A. Gleckler <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:22 PM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> These procedures are all in SRFI 226; SRFI 157 should be considered >>> obsolete by now. >>> >> >> Should I mark SRFI 157 withdrawn and add a note and a link to SRFI 226 in >> its Status section? Same for 154 and 155? SRFIs 15,34, and 39 are by >> different authors, so I should leave those unchanged. >> >
