Hi Mike, Am Mi., 28. Aug. 2024 um 09:53 Uhr schrieb Michael Sperber < [email protected]>:
> > Hi Marc, > > thanks for your e-mail. > > I'm unsure what your question is: The intent was certainly that you > could write 0.125 as 0.1|1, and that intent seems pretty clear from the > wording in R6RS to me. (But I'm biased.) > This is how I have been reading it as well. I currently don't see how to read it differently without making the explicitly given mantissa width meaningless. My question is whether Chez Scheme conforms to R6RS as it unconditionally drops the mantissa width. If 0.125 can be written as 0.1|1, Chez is not conforming (and so issue #866, linked in my initial email, describes an actual bug). Thanks, Marc > -- > Regards, > Mike > > Dr. Michael Sperber > [email protected] > +49 (162) 21 53 292 > +49 (7071) 70896-68 > > Active Group GmbH > Hechinger Str. 12/1 > 72072 Tübingen > Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 224404 > Geschäftsführer: Dr. Michael Sperber >
