On Jul 27, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > This WGLC ended last week. We got two pieces of feedback only. It would be > a lot more comfortable to send this to the IESG with more feedback than that, > even though it’s a pretty simple draft. > > Can we please have a few more reviewers? I assure you it’s pretty short.
The use case is sufficiently far outside a "normal" ARF use case that I didn't feel I had enough context to usefully comment on it. At the protocol level, it's adding a new ARF tag and making no other changes to the protocol, so there's really nothing to say (other than that maybe "not-abuse" would be a more logical name, given we don't have a "spam" type). Whether it makes any operational sense to have it depends on a whole lot of missing details (authentication, typical use case, whether it's likely to be attacked by people claiming that spam is not-spam, who the recipients are, who the senders are, whether it's used MUA->recipients ISP or recipients ISP -> outsourced spam filter provider, MUA to original sender, etc, etc.). Without those details, there's not really much to say about that end of it. That doesn't mean it's a bad idea at all, I think it's probably a good one, just that I'm not sure what there is to say about it. Cheers, Steve > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-marf-not-spam-feedback/ > > Thanks, > -MSK > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Murray S. Kucherawy > Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 2:52 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [marf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-marf-not-spam-feedback > > There has been little feedback about the above draft since its submission, > and given its fairly trivial nature and fit within our charter of SpamRep > convergence, I believe we’re ready to move forward. Therefore… > > This note declares the beginning of a Working Group Last Call on > draft-ietf-marf-not-spam-feedback, ending on July 21st. Please submit any > comments you have about this draft prior to that time, after which we will > begin the process of submitting it to the IESG for review and approval. > > -MSK, as co-chair > > _______________________________________________ > marf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
