On Aug 4, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote: > In > <f5833273385bb34f99288b3648c4f06f13512df...@exch-c2.corp.cloudmark.com>, > on 08/03/2011 > at 06:33 AM, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> said: > >> It's referring to a list of use cases that the ARF was not designed >> to handle. > > What about reports[1] to LE? Is that worth considering in the future?
If we can get some law enforcement folks involved and find out what they want/need, sure. They probably want all sorts of metadata that most reporters can't offer, though. On the other hand, there are already government agencies consuming ARF as it is. -- J.D. Falk the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
