> it sounds to me as if most of the eventual software development effort will > involve IMAP rather than MARF, so I'd think the IMAP WG (if it still exists) > would be a more appropriate location.
There's not currently an IMAP-related working group around, and there isn't likely to be one soon. Barry _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
