On 8 September 2011 15:51, The IESG wrote: > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-marf-not-spam-feedback/
Hi, 2.5 nits not important enough for the general list: * The example uses <URL:http://www.mipassoc.org/arf/> in the first part. This page still points to an ARF draft published in 2008. The example should use <URL:http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5965>, folks reading the first part need to know that this is an RFC before they press DEL. Once that's clear another link to MIPA is fine. * The DKIM signature won't help if the Return-Path is empty (as discussed in RFC 5965) and the SPF HELO result is FAIL; maybe add a note that an SPF PASS result would be ideal. * The third part in the example is obviously truncated. RFC 5965 says that it SHOULD be the complete mail, RFC 3462 and 3462bis say that reporting only a portion of the original mail is okay. Please add an explanation why your example ignored the SHOULD. -Frank _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
