> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Alessandro Vesely > Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 1:26 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] Private vs. "public" FBLs > > I agree on that. I only wrote a separate document after JD said that > non-solicited feedback need to be a different Applicability Statement. > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf/current/msg01117.html > > Yet, it may be convenient to rough-hew that stuff as a separate > document, at least until we hear from JD. I dunno whether WG-doc vs. > individual submission makes any difference in such respect. Please > advise.
There's certainly nothing stopping you from developing your individual submission, but the chairs feel that material should really be rolled into the AS once the WG has consensus on what text to add to it to cover this other specific use case. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
