>Would it perhaps be better to make it Informational rather than >Standards Track? It's been in use (though with the aforementioned >small audience) for several years now, so it at least seems useful to >write it down.
Sure. That gives people a place to start in the (to me, unlikely) event that there's enough demand for this to standardize it. >> Also, to some extent this is an invitation to >> mailbomb anyone who uses it, > >True, but that could also be argued about email addresses in SOA >records, RFC2142 reporting addresses, etc. I think that ship has >sailed. I suppose you're right, there. R's, John _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
