On 10/14/2011 05:23 PM, John R Levine wrote:
I totally agree I was thinking more of the push back from those
generating
them rather than those receiving them.
Well, OK. Given that ARF messages are invariably generated by software
rather than by people, what problem is caused by them generating two or
three messages to report multiple failures rather than one?
The one complication I can think of is that if there is the potential
for getting multiple messages, there's no way to tell if you are going
to get more.
I agree that correlating multiple reports about a single message into a
single "meta-report" for local use would not be a problem. The problem
might be knowing when you had gotten all the reports you were going to
get so you could do that processing.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
