Hello all, Can I please get a reading of WG consensus on the issue of sending multiple reports for a multiply-signed message? This is the only remaining issue before doing a second (perhaps short) WGLC on draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report and then preparing to send it to the IESG. There were other editorial issues, mostly from me, that don't appear to be contentious since nobody else has commented on them, so that's where we're at.
I know John is in favour of this (it was his idea), and it gets a +1 from me as participant since all of the syntax-related solutions we've considered thus far have substantial drawbacks. Hilda had some reservations on the grounds that report generators might not like it much. I'd like to see more opinions registered. -MSK, as co-chair
_______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
