On 10/09/2011 02:43 AM, [email protected] wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Messaging Abuse Reporting Format Working Group
of the IETF.
Title : Authentication Failure Reporting using the Abuse
Report Format
Author(s) : Hilda L. Fontana
Filename : draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-03.txt
Pages : 20
Date : 2011-10-08
...
I think this is much better, but still a few nits:
para 2.2 (I think) also needs to list FWS as an imported definition. It
is listed in 3.2 as imported from DKIM.
para 3.2.3: I think for DKIM-Canonicalized-Header and
DKIM-Canonicalized-Body, instead of saying they can't include redacted
data, it should to be "SHOULD be included unless inclusion would
involved redacted data in which case they MUST NOT be included." I
don't think these fields make sense under any circumstances once they
have been redacted.
para 3.2.5: I think this needs rewording. Current:
SPF-DNS MUST appear once for every query to an SPF record that was
done, to enable the reporting of included fields and where they came
from. The ABNF in Section 4 changes; see below.
proposed:
SPF-DNS MUST appear once for every SPF record used to obtain the SPF result.
I'm not sure that's clear, but I think it a step in the right direction.
para 8.1: The reference to [MAIL] to use RFC 2822 should be updated to 5322.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
