> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > [email protected] > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 9:41 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [marf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting-04.txt > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. This draft is a work item of the Messaging Abuse Reporting > Format Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Extensions to DKIM for Failure Reporting > Author(s) : Murray S. Kucherawy > Filename : draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting-04.txt > Pages : 18 > Date : 2012-01-23 > > This memo presents extensions to the DomainKeys Identified Mail > (DKIM) specification to allow for detailed reporting of message > authentication failures in an on-demand fashion.
Changes since the previous version: - some language tightening with respect to "sender", "signer", etc. - don't reference the SPF reporting document; they may evolve separately, and there's no need for them to hold each other up - move all the broken signature reporting into the signature itself by making them extension DKIM-Signature tags, rather than putting them in the key records in the DNS; the revised design doesn't require DNS queries for failed signatures that don't otherwise need them - remove "rf" (report format) tag for both DKIM and ADSP; assume all generated reports will use ARF - rename "ri" (report interval) to "rp" (report percentage) for both DKIM and ADSP - move report generation normative stuff out of Security Considerations and into its own section that covers report generation syntax and transport issues; reference draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report accordingly - other minor copy editing Fresh reviews and other comments are most welcome. -MSK _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
