Just a point of clarification, this will actually be a third IETF Last Call, after its state change from Informational to Proposed Standard. Whew. :)
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 9:37 PM To: Murray S. Kucherawy Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [marf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-marf-redaction-07.txt > The DISCUSS was cleared this morning. This version includes the changes > based on Alessandro's suggestions, per recent consensus support. We hope > this is the final version. We'll ping Pete to approve this one on Friday if > there > hasn't been any squawking. In case Murray's note wasn't clear on this: We do want some folks to give -07 a final review and make sure that the changes since WG approval are still acceptable. We think the document is now a better one than what we sent to the IESG before. Let's get some confirmation on that, please. Pete is considering, based on IESG feedback, whether or not to issue a second IETF Last Call on the document, similarly to re-confirm consensus after the changes. It's an interesting discussion as to how much may change *after* a document is approved by the community, and before it goes to the RFC Editor. We don't know yet what Pete will do, but even a new Last Call will likely only delay the document by two weeks. Barry
_______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
