> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott > Kitterman > Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 8:23 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] Additional dkim-reporting report type requests > > "p" is embedded in SPF already. If the SPF result is fail and you are > rejecting due to SPF, it's by definition a policy issue.
We're using "policy" differently. An SPF example might be that SPF evaluation passes, but the Verifier demands that SPF only be given credit when the policy includes "-all", and anything else can't truly be trusted. That would be a case where local policy overrides what SPF says, and you actually treat a "pass" as something other than a "pass". That's probably a contrived example but you get the idea. -MSK _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
