> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Shmuel Metz > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 7:49 AM > To: Message Abuse Report Format working group > Subject: [marf] RFC 2119 language > > I believe that we need to be careful to adhere to the definitions in > RFC 2119, specifically 6. Guidance in the use of these Imperatives. In > particular, I don't believe that we should use MUST unless we have > documented that "it is actually required for interoperation or to limit > behavior which has potential for causing harm".
Which document, and which normative uses, are you asking us to review? > I noticed that some drafts use [RFC2119] as a footnote label and some > use [KEYWORDS]. Is that an arbitrary choice, or should we be > consistently using only one, and, if so, which one? It's an arbitrary choice, left to the preferences of the author(s)/editor(s). -MSK _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
