> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott > Kitterman > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 9:23 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-marf-as-07.txt > > I'm generally OK with this, but I think it should be MUST NOT vice > SHOULD NOT.
I suggested SHOULD NOT because RFC2119 defines that as basically "MUST NOT, unless you've given serious thought to why you're ignoring that advice." Does that sound any better? _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
