"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >Of Steve Atkins >> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 10:29 AM >> To: Message Abuse Report Format working group >> Subject: Re: [marf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-marf-as-07.txt >> >> One common case is where the d= domain is that of the entity owning >the >> mailing list and generating the content, while outsourcing the >delivery >> of the mail to an ESP. >> >> In those cases (and it's a very common case) notifying anyone other >> than the ESP is probably a waste of time, while notifying the ESP >will >> be extremely effective. >> >> I'm not sure whether we want to try and teach people what some decent >> heuristics are, or just put in enough suggestions to mitigate the >harm >> done to others if they get it wrong, though. > >It seems to me we're starting down the road of cluttering the document >with counter-examples if we add this. > >Can someone suggest some more generic text here about cases where >reporting to the "d=" is a bad idea, hopefully in ways that the report >generator can detect? > >If not, the two examples we have set the stage nicely, I think. > >-MSK In Steve's example if i= is explicitly set, it may be a better choice. I'm not sure though. Scott K _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
