In
<f5833273385bb34f99288b3648c4f06f19c9a7d...@exch-c2.corp.cloudmark.com>,
on 02/09/2012
   at 10:06 AM, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> said:

>Neither DKIM nor SPF do anything to authenticate the header From
>domain.  What other mechanism are you proposing we introduce?

I'm not; I'm proposing that we be neutral on any potential future
authenticatiobn standards. Or is there reason to believe that there
will never be an RFC for signing domain names in the header?

-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     Atid/2        <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf

Reply via email to