On Monday, February 13, 2012 11:02:50 AM Barry Leiba wrote: > >> A last-minute rewrite of a couple of sections of draft-ietf-marf-as > >> was > >> submitted. The feeling is that Sections 7 and 8 (especially the > >> latter) > >> had become too verbose and confusing, and had the feel of > >> micromanagement. The proposed text is rather more general while still > >> attempting to put the working group's main message into the hands of > >> feedback operators.> > > This is a substantial change and I don't think it is reasonable to > > assume that any working group consensus established during the recently > > completed last call would apply to it. > > I agree, and I will want to hear from at least all the participants > who made WGLC comments, before accepting this version. So far, we've > heard from Scott and Alessandro, who aren't happy with the changes. > That's likely to mean that the document isn't ready to go yet, and > that we need more work to re-achieve consensus on a last-call version. > > Barry, document shepherd
That or decide there's rough consensus on the previous draft. Scott K _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
