On 14/Feb/12 22:33, SM wrote: > Hi Murray, > At 12:41 14-02-2012, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> I think it fits that definition. The "Updates" is appropriate in >> that if one is implementing RFC5965, one should also read this draft. > > No, the question is why is it an AS?
My understanding is^H^H was that an AS allows to "import" a TS from external sources. Something like saying "Hey, that stuff is to be considered Standard-Track, even if it's formally Informational and/or produced outside of the IETF." Recall the bottom paragraph of http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf/current/msg01257.html _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
