>I'm going to proceed on the assumption that the errata will eventually be >confirmed and that's sufficient or some was will be found to stuff it into I- >D.IETF-MARF-AUTHFAILURE-REPORT/AS and that I don't need to directly address it >in the SPF draft. I don't see an non-contrived way to do it.
Since I'm the one who gets to confirm it, that seems like a safe assumption. R's, John _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
