> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott > Kitterman > Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 9:14 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] DISCUSS on draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting > > So is "all" now all recognized tags (so to get all recognized tags one > would ask for "all" and to get everything recognized or not one would > need to ask for "all" and "unrecognized") or all tags recognized and > unrecognized (and to get only all the recognized tags they'd have to be > individually specified)?
"all" would now include reports for signatures seen by Verifiers that don't understand at least one tag, plus anything else in the list we've defined as possible events of interest. > What problem does asking for unrecognized tags solve? I don't think > either of those are ideal. We could also remove the default, making "rr" mandatory so that an implementer has to specify explicitly what report types are of interest. -MSK _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
